Microsoft Help Forums: How to Hack Any Linux Machine in 30 Seconds? - Microsoft Help Forums

Enjoy! I know I did!

http://www.metacafe...._in_30_seconds/

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:

> Enjoy! I know I did!
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/

If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of course,
I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that any machine
is toast if you have physical access to it.

ray wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>
>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>
> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of course,
> I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that any machine
> is toast if you have physical access to it.

No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
vulnerable.

--
Alias

Alias wrote:
> ray wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>
>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>
>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>
> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
> vulnerable.


And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?

Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name starts
with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)

Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
"invulnerable" - there is no grey area.

"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:833i5hFhp0U37@mid.individual.net...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>
>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>
> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of course,
> I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that any machine
> is toast if you have physical access to it.

The fact remains is that very few use that shitty Linux on the desktop so it
doesn't make news. I wouldn't use Linux. It's worth exactly what you pay
for it: NOTHING

> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable"
> or "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.

It is invulnerable to all virii, trojans, spyware and malware
that are living on the internet being passed from Windows
machine to windows machine that require the machine to be
'cleaned'. There are no Linux boxes that get browse-by-installs,
nor fake AV packages installed, etc.

If what made Frank cream his jeans is considered a hack, then
the NTFS password changer boot disk is a hack as well.

Unbeliever wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>
>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>> vulnerable.
>
>
> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?

No, I don't.

>
> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name starts
> with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)

Changed your nym, eh?

>
> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.

What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?

--
Alias

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Unbeliever wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>
>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>> vulnerable.
>>
>>
>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>
> No, I don't.

Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always be a
TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.

>
>>
>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>
> Changed your nym, eh?
>

You dense? Of course you are.


>>
>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>
> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof. IOW,
> not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>
> --
> Alias

Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks who
can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks play
with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.

Bill Yanaire wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>
>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>>> vulnerable.
>>>
>>>
>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>
>> No, I don't.
>
> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always be
> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>
>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>
>
> You dense? Of course you are.
>
>
>>>
>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>
>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks
> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>
>
>

Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies and
the same FUD. Yawn.

--
Alias

"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>
>>> No, I don't.
>>
>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always be
>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>
>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>
>>
>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>
>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks
>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies and
> the same FUD. Yawn.
>
> --
> Alias

Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!

No like? Add me to your killfile.

On 4/19/2010 10:37 AM, Alias wrote:
> ray wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>
>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>
>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of course,
>> I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that any machine
>> is toast if you have physical access to it.
>
> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
> vulnerable.
>
You lying POS linturd pimp. I didn't maker that claim, the authors did.
You're really a stupid pile of useless, lying shit.

On 4/19/2010 11:20 AM, DanS wrote:
>
>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable"
>> or "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>
> It is invulnerable to all virii, trojans, spyware and malware
> that are living on the internet being passed from Windows
> machine to windows machine that require the machine to be
> 'cleaned'. There are no Linux boxes that get browse-by-installs,
> nor fake AV packages installed, etc.
>
> If what made Frank cream his jeans is considered a hack, then
> the NTFS password changer boot disk is a hack as well.
>
>
>
>
Got your pantries all in a bunch dan-o?...LOL!

On 4/19/2010 12:04 PM, Alias wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>
>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>> vulnerable.
>>
>>
>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>
> No, I don't.
>
Lie #1
>>
>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>
> Changed your nym, eh?

Changed your claim, huh?
Figures!
>
>>
>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>
> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.

Lie #2

> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?

Lie #3
Oops!

On 4/19/2010 12:24 PM, Alias wrote:
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>
>>> No, I don't.
>>
>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always be
>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>
>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>
>>
>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>
>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks
>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies and
> the same FUD. Yawn.
>
alias, the linturd pimp, who can only repeat the same lies and
the same FUD. Yawn.

Bill Yanaire wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux is
>>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't.
>>>
>>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always be
>>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>>
>>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
>>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks
>>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies
>> and the same FUD. Yawn.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!
>
> No like? Add me to your killfile.
>
>

No can do as someone might believe your lies.

--
Alias

> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those geeks
> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>

Well some credit you have to give *NIX you are posting through that toy
OS...

For hardware, X-Privat primarily utilizes an x86-32 architecture server
attached to high speed RAID disk array. The server is housed in Italy in
a professionally managed datacenter, including battery buffered power
and high speed network connect. For software, actually we use the DNEWS
and INN software for the NNTP service, running the Linux (CentOs4.4) OS
System. We are studying a new architecture with DIABLO software for the
feeder section, too. The Mail service is based on EWALL Smtp Proxy
server and POSTFIX. We have also a full backUp MX . The WEB service
running APACHE 2.x software with SSL support on CentOs 4.5 OS. The
server are located in two different server farms. The core structure of
X-Privat is internal to our NOC.



http://www.x-privat....stem-status.php

Kindly
Mcwm

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hqjue7$3n9$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too, that
>>>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming Linux
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I don't.
>>>>
>>>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>>>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will always
>>>> be
>>>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>>>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
>>>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those
>>>> geeks
>>>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies and
>>> the same FUD. Yawn.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!
>>
>> No like? Add me to your killfile.
>>
>>
>
> No can do as someone might believe your lies.
>
> --
> Alias

Sorry, but I don't lie. I have to correct the lies and crap that you post
on a daily basis. Just doing my "Noble Mission" and helping out the
community, unlike yourself who is the group troll. Oops.

Bill Yanaire wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hqjue7$3n9$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too,
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming
>>>>>>>> Linux is
>>>>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I don't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>>>>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will
>>>>> always be
>>>>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet proof.
>>>>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for geeks
>>>>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those
>>>>> geeks
>>>>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies
>>>> and the same FUD. Yawn.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!
>>>
>>> No like? Add me to your killfile.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No can do as someone might believe your lies.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Sorry, but I don't lie.

First lie.

> I have to correct the lies and crap that you
> post on a daily basis.

Second lie.

> Just doing my "Noble Mission" and helping out the
> community, unlike yourself who is the group troll. Oops.

Third lie.

--
Alias

Beam me up, Scotty. No intelligent life on this blue orb.



"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hqkh1n$age$5@news.eternal-september.org...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hqjue7$3n9$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too,
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming
>>>>>>>>> Linux is
>>>>>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>>>>>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will
>>>>>> always be
>>>>>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>>>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>>>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet
>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for
>>>>>> geeks
>>>>>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those
>>>>>> geeks
>>>>>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies
>>>>> and the same FUD. Yawn.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!
>>>>
>>>> No like? Add me to your killfile.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No can do as someone might believe your lies.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't lie.
>
> First lie.
>
>> I have to correct the lies and crap that you
>> post on a daily basis.
>
> Second lie.
>
>> Just doing my "Noble Mission" and helping out the
>> community, unlike yourself who is the group troll. Oops.
>
> Third lie.
>
> --
> Alias

"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hqkh1n$age$5@news.eternal-september.org...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hqjue7$3n9$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hqiam9$s98$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hqi9f1$nba$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Unbeliever wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:54:25 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1886490/
>>>>>>>>>> how_to_hack_any_linux_machine_in_30_seconds/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If it was that freaking easy, I'd expect it to HAPPEN. But, of
>>>>>>>>>> course, I've yet to see it in the wild. The fact remains, too,
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> any machine is toast if you have physical access to it.
>>>>>>>>> No shit but that won't stop the Frankenmonster from claiming
>>>>>>>>> Linux is
>>>>>>>>> vulnerable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And of course you claim that Linfux in *invulnerable*?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Horseshit! You always say that Linux doesn't get viruses. Guess what?
>>>>>> Linux is a piece of shit that most reject therefore Linux will
>>>>>> always be
>>>>>> a TOY OS that gains NO momentum. Oops.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now I wonder who really is talking bullshit here - a clue, his name
>>>>>>>> starts with *A* and ends with *s* and is 5 characters long. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changed your nym, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You dense? Of course you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now think before you answer, Linfux is either "vulnerable" or
>>>>>>>> "invulnerable" - there is no grey area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I did post is that *compared* to Windows, Linux is bullet
>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>> IOW, not nearly as vulnerable as Windows. Got it now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Compared to Windows, Linux is just a TOY OS written by geeks for
>>>>>> geeks
>>>>>> who can't get laid and have limited social skills. Therefore those
>>>>>> geeks
>>>>>> play with Linux all day long and just love cryptic line commands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Yanaire, the one trick pony that can only repeat the same lies
>>>>> and the same FUD. Yawn.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Look who's talking, Mr. Daily Ubuntu countdown! LOL!
>>>>
>>>> No like? Add me to your killfile.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No can do as someone might believe your lies.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't lie.
>
> First lie.
>
>> I have to correct the lies and crap that you
>> post on a daily basis.
>
> Second lie.
>
>> Just doing my "Noble Mission" and helping out the
>> community, unlike yourself who is the group troll. Oops.
>
> Third lie.
>
> --
> Alias

Just because you say they are lies doesn't make it so. I have proved in
black and white that you lie and constantly lie. You can prove nothing, you
just grasp at straws. Oops.